Site Meter
« Lunch in St. Tropez, Fall Fashion | Main | Dear Maniacal Rubes, »

Mr. Met, Global Warming, Enron

125835-466047-thumbnail.jpg
Mister Met, American Hero.
My friend Justin, who is now slightly famous from my article on our basketball game for control of Brewster and the country, once said "If you don't like Mr. Met, I have no time for you. I mean, how can you not like him? Do you hate America or something? Basically if you don't like Mr. Met I say, "Fuck you."

I totally agree. So I was happy to see that more and more New Yorkers are getting into the Mets in this New York Times article.  But there was one odd bit from the end.

While casual fans waver with their allegiances each season, the hardliners — those Yankees fans who would sooner root for global warming than for the Mets, and the hard-core Mets fans who consider the Yankees only slightly less evil than Enron — will not budge from their positions, no matter how well-reasoned the argument for supporting the other team might be. - Allen Salkin

Uhm. I've been as tough on conservatives who stub their toes and blame the liberal media as anyone - but gosh, who uses global warming and Enron as their two stand ins for "bad things" in a sports article?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Source
    The two franchises have been fighting for the heart of the city since 1962, when the Mets played their first regular-season game and soon became the laughingstock of the sports pages. The Mets, with their hungry teams and improbable victories, have buoyed and won over the city occasionally — most famously in 1969, and more recently in the late 1980’s, a rough time for the Yankees. But for the most part, the 103-year-old Yankees, with their law-firm haircuts, subtle pinstripes and 26 World Series

Reader Comments (10)

Please do not stub your own toes.

Hope you've considered that in addition to more lawyers the world might use (intelligent) schoolteachers, bank examiners, surveyors, statisticians, purchasing agents, departement store buyers, industrial psychologists, machinists, forensic accountants, budget analysts, appraisers, pharmacists, hospital administrators, translators, underwriters, claims adjusters, actuaries, archivists, museum curators, librarians, town planners, brokerage clerks, and technicians in wineries, brewieries, and distilleries. Learning one of these trades might put you less in hock, and be more suitable. (And my apologies if unsolicited suggestions irritate you).
9/12/2006 12:14 PM | Unregistered CommenterArt Deco
There was an excellent print ad that ran on the subways for a while that said "Mr. Met may be silly but you still have to call him Mister"

It was quite funny.

I think his point is that nobody likes global warming or Enron's accounting and business models. I think he was trying to communicate the gravity of the allegiances for the people who hold them. Fans of sports teams treat every setback as if it is a disaster worthy of a Al Gore slide show or a prosecution by Elliot Spitzer.
9/13/2006 01:00 PM | Unregistered Commentercousin ell
I mean, I'm not going to make a federal case about it. It's just odd, no? ANyway- the more salient bit about the paragraph, brough to my attention by Kevin Michael Grace is that it tells us absolutely nothing we don't already know. Not only is the execution lame, so is the idea.

9/13/2006 07:20 PM | Registered CommenterMichael Brendan Dougherty
You're right. Political issues just aren't that funny. Best stick to personalities.

(I'm serious.)
9/13/2006 11:40 PM | Unregistered CommenterNicholas G. Moses
P.S.: Yankees own you.

(I checked, and you do not have a comments policy against this.)
9/13/2006 11:42 PM | Unregistered CommenterNicholas G. Moses
Yes, it is well nigh impossible to hate Mr. Met, even for a cynical, stewed in the culture of defeat Phillies fan such as myself.

However, I will say this: some Mets fans are louts. I know, I know, Philadelphia sports fans are regarded as the most boorish fans this side of English football hooligans. But hear me out. It's loutish to travel to another team's stadium in order to drunkenly jeer that team, as Mets fans have done every time I've been at a Phillies-Mets game in Philly. It's loutish to refuse to pay respects to worthy opponents, as Mets fans did in chanting, "No more hits!" to Chase Utley when the Mets stopped cold his 35-game hitting streak. One should always pay respect to opponents, particularly those who play the game in the hard-nosed, old-school way. One ought not jeer even the Yankees, who are the Evil Empire of sports.

That said, however, I expect the Mets to play the Yankees in the World Series, and will enthusiastically back the Mets. The Yankees are, you know; and National League ball is real baseball.
9/14/2006 09:03 AM | Unregistered CommenterMaximos
Well, these New Yorkers have been Cardinal fans since Frankie Frisch - the Fordham Flash - went to play in St Louis. And Albert Pujols rocks!
Though, like Maximos, I prefer National League ball it is now beyond doubt that the American League dominates the game. So the Yankees will win yet again and we can all wallow in righteous indignation.
9/14/2006 09:34 AM | Unregistered CommenterVicki
What's wrong with Ellit Spitzer? His prosecutions are against the Yankee elites - They are on behalf of the Mets folks - they ordinary New Yorker.

Spitzer is gonna win - he will do a very good job and he may be President within ten years.Sorry,
9/20/2006 04:28 PM | Unregistered CommenterComment
Regarding your main point - yeah , it's odd to see allusions to Enron and Global Warming in a sports article.

It's the kind of thing a scriptwriter would have a character do if he wanted to paint him [the sportswriter] a certain way - or maybe it's the type of odd detail many on the right would imagine (incorrectly) was common in the left-leaning elite sports press ....

Then again - there was something about that crooked E Enron symbol....
9/20/2006 04:48 PM | Unregistered CommenterComment
Reading this again, I suddenly wonder if Ann Coulter did not have a point when she mentioned liberalism being a religion all its own. In the past, such allusions would have normally been allocated to hated, boorish, ungenerous, uncharitable figures, to demons, etc.
9/24/2006 10:53 PM | Unregistered CommenterNicholas G. Moses

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.