Fortune Cookie Neoconservatism
![]()
What will killing people do for us todayEveryone knows you can get a good laugh out of your meal at the local Chinese Buffet by opening your fortune cookie, reading the message aloud and adding two words on the end of the message: in bed. If you haven't tried it before here are some examples:
You are talented with your hands.
Now is a lucky time for you to take a chance
Watch your relations with other people carefully, be more reserved.
No obstacles will stand in the way of your success this month.
Now I've discovered, with the help of booze and Jim Antle of 4pundits.com that there is a phrase that you can tack on to most neoconservative op-eds and essays - which helps to clarify the point they are trying to make. Whenever a neoconservative says something should be done, whether it is democracy promotion, or instilling purpose in an enervated American populace, or diplomacy you can finish the thought for him by adding three little words: by killing people. Here, try it out:
David Brooks It almost doesn't matter what great task government sets for itself, as long as it does some tangible thing with energy and effectiveness.
Michael Ledeen: These actions will signal the next stage of the war against the terror masters, which is the vigorous support of the pro-democracy forces in Syria and Iran... It is a wondrous window of opportunity. As so often in our history, it was opened by our enemies. Let’s go for it.
William Kristol and Robert Kagan (circa 1996): Having defeated the "evil empire," the United States enjoys strategic and ideological predominance. The first objective of U.S. foreign policy should be to preserve and enhance that predominance by strengthening America's security, supporting its friends, advancing its interests, and standing up for its principles around the world.
Victor Davis Hanson: Even in this era of crisis, we cling to the notion that in the eleventh hour you, Europe, will yet reawake, rediscover your heritage, and join with us in defending the idea of the West from this latest illiberal scourge of Islamic fascism.
David Brooks (again): So America was to strive upward. But toward what? Toward more wealth? Greater scientific achievement? Bigger buildings? No, these were just steps along the way. America's mission was to advance civilization itself.
Of course this trick doesn't always work. But you will again never look at the Weekly Standard as just another Beltway publication. With just these three words it becomes a black comedy and a prism through which we can understand the past and future of the Republic, and the Republicans.
Fred Barnes: Democrats have convinced themselves that times are different today, different even from 2002 and 2004, when Bush and Republicans used terrorism and national security to win unexpected victories.
Well well. This post has brought alot of attention to this blog, through LewRockwell, Andrew Sullivan, Alternet and other sites, including DemocraticUnderground. I welcome all readers but they should be warned that I'm not a funny liberal. Also, this post was not meant to sum up ALL my views on war and peace, the Middle East, foreign policy, the unique ideological development of neoconservatism - etc. etc..
I'm quite surprised that someone clever and ideologically hostile to me hasn't rejoined by saying that paleo-cons have their own magic words. I can certainly think of a few that would be unflattering and funny.
Share this: del.icio.us | Digg | Google | Ma.gnolia | Reddit | Stumble Upon | Technorati
References (2)
-
Response: ...By Killing PeopleEver played the "in bed" game with fortune cookies? Surfeited with Dainties has a new version to play with the neocons. (Hat tip: Dappled Things).... -
Response: ...By Killing PeopleEver played the "in bed" game with fortune cookies? Via Dappled Things, Surfeited with Dainties has a new version to play with the neocons....







Reader Comments (28)
I know - this is a tangent. But it somehow heightens the effect of the fortune cookie exercise: defend the Idea of the West - by killing people. I once thought it excessive to refer to this sort of ideological blow-by as Jacobinism. But I was very wrong.
I say it's time to start calling the Republicans "The Armageddon Party," with its new animal symbol, the Lemming. The party is composed of various wing(net)s:
The "Left Behind" Wing (also sometimes known as the "Kill The Faggots" Wing, which self-identifies as the "Christian Right");
The "Fleece the Rubes" Wing (also known as the Corporatists or Plutocrats);
The "Strangle the Cities" Wing (which self-identifies as Rural America);
The "Bomb 'Em Back to the Stone Age" Wing (sometimes called "hawks," which self-identifies as "Superpatriots"); and
The "Irrelevant" Wing (which self-identifies as Libertarian).
In this context, the Bush Base can be summed up as composed of
Lemmings (just a few more steps toward the cliff and Victory is Ours);
Haters (the people who were so put out when it was no longer socially acceptable to hate "Negroes" that they immediately needed to find another 10% minority to mindlessly hate);
Hicks (with Electoral College votes out of proportion to their numbers);
War Profiteers (like Dick Warbucks Cheney, the Traitor who dealt with Iran while President of Halliburton, even though it was against US law); and
Their Tools and Mouthpieces (like most of the people quoted above, Fox News, et alia).
Then perhaps we can have new descriptive slogans for the War in Iraq:
The New War of Attrition (Vietnam worked so well...);
One Pyrrhic Victory After Another;
The War to Save Saudi Oil Profits; or
The War to Raise Gas Prices.
This no-win war has been brought to you by (pick one):
Nero W. Bush, the man who vacationed while New Orleans drowned and read children's books while New York and Washington were under attack;
The False Prophet;
The Enron President;
The Failed C.E.O.; or perhaps
Landslide George (the Diebold President).
It's easy and fun, once you get started.
No laughing allowed,eh? Give me a break. Sometimes a man just doesn't feel like going to all the trouble to demonstrate how misguided certain people are about Strauss or Arab history and culture. Luckily we have killjoys like you to call me an idiot.
Thanks for the comment.
Michael
And maybe laughter is the key to beating them. They have gotten as far as they have because people have always taken them so very, very seriously, and they are always very, very serious. Painfully, wretchedly, hellishly serious. Perhaps if people just started laughing at them the moment they walked in the room, they would get so agitated that they would reveal the depths of their bellicosity and madness for all to see. Watch Bill Kristol on the Colbert Report to see a man who is deeply uncomfortable and ill at ease--he doesn't fare well in that environment because he cannot expect Colbert to treat him with the pathetic deference he gets from the typical Sunday talk show host. Tyrants cannot stand the sound of laughter. Keep up the good work, Michael.
For example:
Neglect schools and education...
Revoke unions....
Cancel labour laws and workplace safety.....
Privatise Social Security.....
Allow outsourcing.....
Reduce the Minimum Wage....
Cut funding for Medicare and Medicaid....
Privatise drug programs.....
etc.
I must say, he was damn prescient. Goody. Now we all get to study the latest eruption of clerofascists. Oh what joy! Bring it on. :-(
Wit is insight issued with brevity, and generally much more intelligently presented than a dry dialectic. "By killing people" ruefully highlights the unstated consequence/method of neocon foreign policy. And it's funnier than hell.
I think that commenter you refer to is onto something, at least in part. It's not so easy to come up with a succinct phrase comparable to "by killing people", though. "By lowering the wages of labour", "By increasing the returns to capital", etc.
In other words, Bob has a point, too. Victory isn't something to be achieved simply by switching from one tactic to another, buying votes and power by playing the popularity games. That's part of what we're so mad at the Republicans (and even the Democrats, at times) for, remember?
Still. Good post. Makes me want to re-read the neo-con arguments about policing our borders.
a. because of Roe v Wade
b. if not for government interference
c. by God's Grace
or
d. by God's Grace, enforcing our will through government interference and control of people who make us uncomfortable because of Roe v Wade
"by keeping out foriegners"
- it applies to raising American wages
- maintaining our distinct cultural heritage
- returning to a less aggressive foriegn policy
First, to open lines:
In the Old Republic...
The historic American people...
And to end lines,
...America's unique culture.
and
... America first.
But I can't match Michael's "by keeping out foreigners," and although I'm exhausted, I'm not funny just now. Must need a drink.
Will return.