Site Meter
« What's So Bad 'Bout Blood and Soil? (And Fortune Cookies) | Main | WSJ: Open The Borders 'Round McAdams? »

Fortune Cookie Neoconservatism

125835-441075-thumbnail.jpg
What will killing people do for us today
Everyone knows you can get a good laugh out of your meal at the local Chinese Buffet by opening your fortune cookie, reading the message aloud and adding two words on the end of the message: in bed. If you haven't tried it before here are some examples:

You are talented with your hands.

Now is a lucky time for you to take a chance

Watch your relations with other people carefully, be more reserved.

No obstacles will stand in the way of your success this month.

Now I've discovered, with the help of booze and Jim Antle of 4pundits.com that there is a phrase that you can tack on to most neoconservative op-eds and essays - which helps to clarify the point they are trying to make. Whenever a neoconservative says something should be done, whether it is democracy promotion, or instilling purpose in an enervated American populace, or diplomacy you can finish the thought for him by adding three little words: by killing people. Here, try it out:   

David Brooks It almost doesn't matter what great task government sets for itself, as long as it does some tangible thing with energy and effectiveness.

Michael Ledeen: These actions will signal the next stage of the war against the terror masters, which is the vigorous support of the pro-democracy forces in Syria and Iran... It is a wondrous window of opportunity. As so often in our history, it was opened by our enemies. Let’s go for it.

William Kristol and Robert Kagan (circa 1996): Having defeated the "evil empire," the United States enjoys strategic and ideological predominance. The first objective of U.S. foreign policy should be to preserve and enhance that predominance by strengthening America's security, supporting its friends, advancing its interests, and standing up for its principles around the world.

Victor Davis Hanson: Even in this era of crisis, we cling to the notion that in the eleventh hour you, Europe, will yet reawake, rediscover your heritage, and join with us in defending the idea of the West from this latest illiberal scourge of Islamic fascism.

David Brooks (again): So America was to strive upward. But toward what? Toward more wealth? Greater scientific achievement? Bigger buildings? No, these were just steps along the way. America's mission was to advance civilization itself.

Of course this trick doesn't always work. But you will  again never look at the Weekly Standard as just another Beltway publication. With just these three words it becomes a black comedy and a prism through which we can understand the past and future of the Republic, and the Republicans.

Fred Barnes: Democrats have convinced themselves that times are different today, different even from 2002 and 2004, when Bush and Republicans used terrorism and national security to win unexpected victories.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (2)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Ever played the "in bed" game with fortune cookies? Surfeited with Dainties has a new version to play with the neocons. (Hat tip: Dappled Things)....
  • Response
    Ever played the "in bed" game with fortune cookies? Via Dappled Things, Surfeited with Dainties has a new version to play with the neocons....

Reader Comments (28)

Awesome concept. It's funny because it's true.
8/24/2006 09:54 AM | Unregistered CommenterRobert
What the hell is the idea of the West, as opposed to the historic identities and communities of the various peoples who collectively comprise the civilizational entity known as The West? Is it not enough that neoconservatives have reduced America to the Proposition Nation? Must they now effect the same reduction upon the civilization of which America is a part? The West is now a mere Idea, for which we must be prepared to kill?

I know - this is a tangent. But it somehow heightens the effect of the fortune cookie exercise: defend the Idea of the West - by killing people. I once thought it excessive to refer to this sort of ideological blow-by as Jacobinism. But I was very wrong.
8/24/2006 10:03 AM | Unregistered CommenterMaximos
Well, you should really credit Aristophanes since it was his joke originally in 'The Frogs'.
8/24/2006 10:51 AM | Unregistered CommenterEarle
Bravo man brilliant idea.
8/24/2006 02:20 PM | Unregistered CommenterDick Donkeysaber
Didn't SNL cover this a few years ago with an opening Hard Ball skit (the one where Christopher Walken plays the french guy)?
8/24/2006 03:53 PM | Unregistered CommenterMike
If nothing can be done to stop neo-cons and other pseudo-conservatives from misusing language and linguistics to demonize their enemies, maybe it's time to get into the ring with them and really have it out.

I say it's time to start calling the Republicans "The Armageddon Party," with its new animal symbol, the Lemming. The party is composed of various wing(net)s:

The "Left Behind" Wing (also sometimes known as the "Kill The Faggots" Wing, which self-identifies as the "Christian Right");

The "Fleece the Rubes" Wing (also known as the Corporatists or Plutocrats);

The "Strangle the Cities" Wing (which self-identifies as Rural America);

The "Bomb 'Em Back to the Stone Age" Wing (sometimes called "hawks," which self-identifies as "Superpatriots"); and

The "Irrelevant" Wing (which self-identifies as Libertarian).

In this context, the Bush Base can be summed up as composed of

Lemmings (just a few more steps toward the cliff and Victory is Ours);

Haters (the people who were so put out when it was no longer socially acceptable to hate "Negroes" that they immediately needed to find another 10% minority to mindlessly hate);

Hicks (with Electoral College votes out of proportion to their numbers);

War Profiteers (like Dick Warbucks Cheney, the Traitor who dealt with Iran while President of Halliburton, even though it was against US law); and

Their Tools and Mouthpieces (like most of the people quoted above, Fox News, et alia).

Then perhaps we can have new descriptive slogans for the War in Iraq:

The New War of Attrition (Vietnam worked so well...);

One Pyrrhic Victory After Another;

The War to Save Saudi Oil Profits; or

The War to Raise Gas Prices.

This no-win war has been brought to you by (pick one):

Nero W. Bush, the man who vacationed while New Orleans drowned and read children's books while New York and Washington were under attack;

The False Prophet;

The Enron President;

The Failed C.E.O.; or perhaps

Landslide George (the Diebold President).

It's easy and fun, once you get started.

8/24/2006 09:54 PM | Unregistered CommenterNH4
Huh huh. It would also be pretty funny to put the 3 words "by taxing people" after any op-ed by someone on, say, salon. Point being, of course, that idiotic simple minded criticisms like this are pointless. These people are scum, but you need to refute them with intelligence, not idiocy.
8/24/2006 10:51 PM | Unregistered CommenterBob
Bob,

No laughing allowed,eh? Give me a break. Sometimes a man just doesn't feel like going to all the trouble to demonstrate how misguided certain people are about Strauss or Arab history and culture. Luckily we have killjoys like you to call me an idiot.

Thanks for the comment.

Michael
8/25/2006 12:15 AM | Registered CommenterMichael Brendan Dougherty
Frankly, in the Bush era we need a good laugh more than an incisive work of policy analysis. Besides, why on earth should we need elaborate refutations of their position, when it can virtually be summed up as "killing people for their own good--and for freedom!"? It is difficult to get more simple-minded and idiotic than that. The sad truth is that more people have come to reject the administration because of Jon Stewart et al. than because of anything that any realist or paleo critic has managed to offer--this is a testament to how far gone the people are, but there it is.

And maybe laughter is the key to beating them. They have gotten as far as they have because people have always taken them so very, very seriously, and they are always very, very serious. Painfully, wretchedly, hellishly serious. Perhaps if people just started laughing at them the moment they walked in the room, they would get so agitated that they would reveal the depths of their bellicosity and madness for all to see. Watch Bill Kristol on the Colbert Report to see a man who is deeply uncomfortable and ill at ease--he doesn't fare well in that environment because he cannot expect Colbert to treat him with the pathetic deference he gets from the typical Sunday talk show host. Tyrants cannot stand the sound of laughter. Keep up the good work, Michael.
8/25/2006 12:56 AM | Unregistered CommenterDaniel Larison
I recall reading a poster's comment on Smirking Chimp which captured this bullet train of thought. But his destination was slightly different. He said any policy of the neocons could be described as "cheap labour conservative."

For example:

Neglect schools and education...
Revoke unions....
Cancel labour laws and workplace safety.....
Privatise Social Security.....
Allow outsourcing.....
Reduce the Minimum Wage....
Cut funding for Medicare and Medicaid....
Privatise drug programs.....
etc.

I must say, he was damn prescient. Goody. Now we all get to study the latest eruption of clerofascists. Oh what joy! Bring it on. :-(
8/25/2006 01:33 AM | Unregistered CommenterLord Piers
Bob's post referring to the fortune cookie addition as idiotic and simple minded fails to appreciate the concise point made by it's humor.

Wit is insight issued with brevity, and generally much more intelligently presented than a dry dialectic. "By killing people" ruefully highlights the unstated consequence/method of neocon foreign policy. And it's funnier than hell.
8/25/2006 02:01 AM | Unregistered CommenterMichael Shaw
Right up there with the "and a pony" meme.
8/25/2006 03:40 AM | Unregistered CommenterTomas
Lord Piers,

I think that commenter you refer to is onto something, at least in part. It's not so easy to come up with a succinct phrase comparable to "by killing people", though. "By lowering the wages of labour", "By increasing the returns to capital", etc.
8/25/2006 07:24 AM | Unregistered CommenterMaximos
Hmm. I agree with Daniel... but. Comedy is a great and terrible weapon to unleash in rhetorics, because it can make even the weakest argument sound plausible- at least more plausible than the opponent's. We don't need to police all the blogs, streetcorners and barstools to stop people from telling political jokes. At the same time, we can't afford to become the tyrant's jesters, winning support with laughter that can't be kept with good governence alone.

In other words, Bob has a point, too. Victory isn't something to be achieved simply by switching from one tactic to another, buying votes and power by playing the popularity games. That's part of what we're so mad at the Republicans (and even the Democrats, at times) for, remember?

Still. Good post. Makes me want to re-read the neo-con arguments about policing our borders.
8/25/2006 11:16 AM | Unregistered CommenterArafelis
Well, I hope some of you all stick around and read my blog occasionally - even if it is only to get an idea of what one young, occasionally drunk conservative is thinking.
8/25/2006 12:01 PM | Registered CommenterMichael Brendan Dougherty
Michael the paleoconservative versions would be:
a. because of Roe v Wade
b. if not for government interference
c. by God's Grace
or
d. by God's Grace, enforcing our will through government interference and control of people who make us uncomfortable because of Roe v Wade

8/25/2006 05:10 PM | Unregistered Commentercousin ell
I was thinking of even nastier ones like

"by keeping out foriegners"
- it applies to raising American wages
- maintaining our distinct cultural heritage
- returning to a less aggressive foriegn policy
8/26/2006 12:07 AM | Registered CommenterMichael Brendan Dougherty
Delightful! Satire is a powerful political weapon, and this joke aptly encapsulates the logical conclusion of neocon policy.
8/26/2006 01:01 AM | Unregistered CommenterC.H. Marengo
Ell doesn't seem to have hung out much with paleos. Let's see:

First, to open lines:

In the Old Republic...

The historic American people...

And to end lines,

...America's unique culture.

and

... America first.

But I can't match Michael's "by keeping out foreigners," and although I'm exhausted, I'm not funny just now. Must need a drink.
8/26/2006 04:46 AM | Unregistered CommenterNicholas Stix
A completely new approach to politics (for me) thank you. :-)
Will return.
8/26/2006 04:49 AM | Unregistered CommenterLia Sáile

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.