Site Meter
« Watch the Mets with Me? | Main | Theocons »

Adventures in Celebrity Profiles

125835-502119-thumbnail.jpg
Your fans are insufferable, sir.
Can I be the first person who says that Stephen Colbert needs to be taken down a notch? He may not need it personally- but the profile writers need to calm down. Yes, Colbert is fantastic - really the only working political satirist on television. But the cover story in New York magazine which touts itself as having some insight into the coming election - is absurd. Colbert's show makes fun of the white guy who has "my black friend." But every time I read a profile of Colbert I feel like the journalist is saying "Hey look, this is my church-going-from the South--Catholic friend."

This has been a very good year for Stephen Colbert, both the 42-year-old, God-fearing, Catholic Church–attending comedian and his even-more-God-fearing, lefty-baiting, fact-averse TV alter ego. He’s about to celebrate the first anniversary of his show, The Colbert Report, on the very first episode of which he coined truthiness, a term that’s been embraced as the summarizing concept of our age.  - Adam Sternbergh

Yikes.  But the worst is yet to come.

So to anyone who worried that Colbert would wither as a one-note parody, stunted by The Daily Show’s shadow, take heed: He now stands astride the political landscape, his mob of followers at the ready. Colbertisms ring throughout the land—and not just from the mouth of Colbert. The best testament to the triumph of the Colbertocracy is that you can now hear a Colbert line like “I believe the government that governs best is the government that governs least, and by these standards, we have set up a fabulous government in Iraq” and, devoid of context, you might genuinely wonder if it came from a parodist, a pundit, or from the president himself. - Adam Sternbergh

I was worried man. But, uh - isn't that what a parodist supposed to do? Colbert is supposed to sound like the person he is parodying but give you the subtle wink or verbal cue that lets you know how absurd it all is. That's his job. He's effective at it. Great stuff.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Source
    He thrusts his arms out in mock triumph. The audience roars. He offers a couple of V-for-victory gestures that are part Richard Nixon and part chest-thumping, peace-out-homey sign. Then he motions for everyone to quiet down and asks, “Do you have any questions? Anything you want to know about me before I go into character and start saying these terrible things?”

Reader Comments (4)

Stephen Colbert is a gifted comic, and the whole Bush administration / Fox News / Talk radio crowd do need to be satirised. So bravo Stephen. But the left liberal / academic / journalist / "we care more than you do" crowd also need their time in the haw haw spotlight, and (apart from South Park) they just aren't getting it. There was a recent article in the UK's Spiked Online (see http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/0000000CAF63.htm) which says it better than I.
10/11/2006 07:33 AM | Unregistered CommenterTim
I thought it was a pretty good profile, except for that Colbert Power ending.
10/11/2006 09:15 AM | Unregistered CommenterJeremy Lott
David Cross on the Colbert Report actually does fulfill the function of making fun of the Left by being as ineffectual as humanly possible during debates, as did the Daily Show during the 2004 Democratic Convention (if you have not seen the segment where Colbert rounds up representatives of the Dem coalition in one room you simply have not lived) and the Simpsons and Family Guy have taken regular stabs at leftists as well. ("I'm a Level 5 Vegan: I don't eat anything that casts a shadow")

There is plenty of fun making to go around considering that your average leftist seems to get their worldview from "The Real World" and the average rightist seems to get theirs from Rush Limbaugh but there is little point in satirizing the people who are not in power.

10/11/2006 03:00 PM | Unregistered Commenterellenbrenna
Sorry, Mr Sternburgh, but I correctly called every one of the "Was it Coulter or Colbert?" questions. The two have completely different stylies. The only one that gave me pause was Number 6.
10/11/2006 11:06 PM | Unregistered CommenterJames Kabala

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.